There have been several news stories recently about a lawsuit filed against the city of Doraville. Unfortunately I cannot comment on the pending litigation, but I can point you to this statement that the city has released:
About 5 years ago, I heard about a new “private social network” called “Nextdoor.” It seemed to solve a lot of the problems that I had seen with neighborhood email lists:
I was sold, and became the founding member of the Northwoods Nextdoor group. I’ve actively promoted the tool since, because I think it’s valuable for neighbors to connect with each other and to know what’s happening in their area. I’m proud that the Northwoods is the largest Nextdoor neighborhood in Doraville with over 530 members (about 19% of Northwoods households are represented there).
As the founding member of the Northwoods network, I’ve also been the primary lead (moderator) for Northwoods for the past 5 years (I just received a “badge” from the site for doing this). I’ve tried to use a light touch with moderating – opting to close conversations that were just people arguing the same points back and forth only after they had gone on for a while, gone off topic or if there were other threads that were commenting on the same thing; only voting to delete comments that were truly insulting to others, and trying not to let my personal feelings about comments someone made affect how I chose to moderate.
Since being elected to city council, I’ve been concerned about how effective I can be as a Nextdoor lead. I feel like I cannot fairly moderate discussions that are commenting on issues that I will vote on or have voted on in my capacity as a Councilman. At the same time, the moderating on Nextdoor function is necessary – especially to close conversations that have gone on too long, or to delete particularly insulting comments aimed at individuals. After considering this for a while, I decided last week to nominate several people as Nextdoor leads and to retire my “Nextdoor lead” status.
The people I nominated into these lead positions are community leaders in Northwoods, or else have been active on Nextdoor for a long time, and do not have a history of getting involved in a lot of back-and forth arguments with others. I nominated several of them so that no individual has the burden of having to make the call on every single post. It’s going to take them a while to learn how the site works – I’m sure they’ll all do a great job. It’s not always an easy job, so please be patient with them while they get their bearings.
I appreciate all the people who have joined Northwoods’ Nextdoor site over the last 5 years, as well as the new leads who are filling in for me now that I’m stepping down.
At the June 4th Doraville city council work session, ahead of month-long deliberations on the city’s 2019 operating budget, the city manager gave an overview of where Doraville stands today with its budget and what she and other members of staff recommend we do going forward.
Some key points:
In addition, there are a number initiatives that the city might want to embark on that are not currently funded (and that there is no funding for) with the current tax levels. These include several building improvements, IT upgrades, and staff hires. The city would need to raise 10.451 mills in order to achieve everything that was presented to the council on Monday night, it would require a tax rate of 10.451 mills (this would be an increase of $90 a year for someone who’s home is worth $175,000). The city’s millage rate is capped at 10 mills, so in the next presentation they give to us, they will show the cost of each initiative in an a la carte fashion. We’ll need to decide whether we want to raise taxes even to 10 mills.
There are several meetings that will be happening in June where the budget is going to be discussed.
The millage rate and budget must be adopted by June 30th, 2018. I would like to hear more from you about what you think of this presentation – where you would like to see the city spending more money, and where you would like to see it spending less money. You can email me at email@example.com or call me at 678-373-9137.
At its May 21st meeting, Doraville’s city council voted in favor of granting a conditional use permit allowing St Martin’s Episcopal School to take three parcels of land along Stewart Road and to use them for athletic fields for their students. These properties currently house several vacant buildings (including “Star Towers”) and have been an eyesore for at least 10 years. I’m excited that we’ll be seeing a transformation of this area into active sports fields and well-maintained green space.
I spoke with many people who were in favor of this development, but there was also some vocal opposition to this development – especially from people who live in the neighborhood that directly abuts the property. Opponents are primarily concerned about nuisance sound from a loudspeaker system at the side of the property closest to Buford Highway, as well as increased parking and traffic on Stewart Road.
I was one of the 5 council members who voted in favor of this conditional use. I voted this way, because I think these sports fields will have economic and social benefits for the city. Specifically:
I heard a few other negative comments about the proposal, which I’ll address below:
Federal law prohibits discriminating against religious institutions based on whether or not they’ll pay property taxes. This was not an argument that I could consider even if I agreed with it.
I will say that the overall drag that these lots have had on property values up and down Stewart and Buford Highway probably far outweighs the $25,000 a year that they have been bringing in as vacant eyesores. After the improvements, I believe that we will see a broad increase in property values that far exceeds the value of $25,000 a year.
I think there are plenty of ways that our community will benefit from having an actively engaged landowner controlling these properties. The school has stated that they are willing to work with the city on allowing some local use of the facilities, based on availability within their schedule. They are maintaining a 40’ buffer between their property and the homes on Stewart Court the that will maintain much of the existing tree canopy there. They also agreed to creation of a pocket park on Stewart Road, which is mainly going to benefit people who live in that immediate vicinity.
I think there is actually quite a lot of general public benefit being offered here – certainly more than we’d see in most developments that might have happened at this location.
I cannot speak to anything a council 4 or 6 years ago may have voted for and then did not follow through on. As far as I know, nothing has been paid for demolition of Star Towers by Doraville, nor is anything budgeted for this.
I believe that a lot of consideration was given to this matter. This development came before the planning commission twice: it was first presented to them at their April 12th meeting, and they recommended we vote “yes” on it at their May 2nd meeting. We then held the council meeting 19 days later. There was a lot of time for people to speak at public meetings and otherwise advocate for and against. I don’t think delaying the vote would have added anything to the process.
I think there was a proposal to build town homes here a while back, and it was sunk by concerns about parking, traffic, etc.
I imagine that any builders that would have wanted to build housing here would want to put in multi-family housing, which would have a much larger impact on the surrounding neighborhood’s traffic than the sports fields would.
I believe I am protecting the interests of the neighborhood by approving this less intense use.
I can only speak for myself, but no one told me how to vote, nor was I sure what other council members were going to do. In fact, I was actively waiting for the open meeting to hear the public’s comments, as well as to see what conditions the school might be willing to agree to. There are people who felt strongly on both sides of this issue, and I heard from many of them. I believe that I gave full consideration to all sides, and believe that other council members did as well. In the end, I did what I thought was best for the city, based on the knowledge that I had.
This was not an easy decision, or one I took lightly. As a member of city council, I can’t comment on a case before I’ve considered it, which is why I remained silent while someone was spreading the untrue rumor that “the fix is in.” I don’t expect people who disagree with my vote to be happy with the outcome, but I want everyone to understand my rationale for that vote and to understand that I did give full consideration to all sides.
At its May 7th meeting, the Doraville city council unanimously approved two big changes to the area around Longmire and Buford Highway. Because of these decisions, you will see more activity in that area over the coming months and years. I think that the changes move us closer to the active, diverse and thriving vision our city has laid out for Buford Highway in both our 2016 Comprehensive Plan as well as the 2017 Doraville/Chamblee Buford Highway Master Plan.
There were a few concerns that were brought to me about this re-zoning by members of the public, which I believe the council addressed:
Some people were concerned that, because the owner plans to use this location to process dry cleaning from other locations he owns, that the store would not be open to the public. The council addressed this by requiring in the conditions for rezoning that the business be open to the public. For his part, the owner stated that the reason he wants to open the business there is because it is better situated for retail traffic. He had no problems with adding this provision.
The other concern I heard about from residents about opening a dry cleaner in this location was that this business may pose environmental hazards to our community. Council addressed this by requiring that the establishment not use any solvents that have an ignitable flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Also, PERC (a toxic cleaning substance) is prohibited in this establishment.
With the recent loss of Pride cleaners in Pinetree Plaza, I think a new dry cleaner along Buford Highway is something Doraville sorely needs, so I am excited to be welcoming this new business to our city.
Harold Shinn, owner of Buford Highway Farmer’s Market (which is across the street this property) expressed deep concern in the public portion of the meeting about how having a church across the street from him with over 1100 members would affect his Sunday morning parking.
The pastor of the church, Leonce Crump, offered several solutions and committed to work with Mr. Shinn to make sure parking didn’t become a problem. The church would have parking monitors patrolling Longmire to make sure that people aren’t parking where they shouldn’t. He’s also exploring a deal with Chik-Fil-A to use their parking (since they are closed on Sunday). A condition was placed on the church that they must seek third party parking if there are verified complaints against them.
My biggest concern was pedestrian accessibility to the church (they are promoting its location as a short walk from MARTA as one of the reasons they are moving here). I’m pleased to say that, in addition to extending the sidewalk along the length of their property on Longmire, Renovation Church will also build it out all the way to New Peachtree (assuming the city is able to secure right of way). They are also going to build a covered bus stop and offer a shuttle service to and from the Doraville MARTA station.
Renovation Church’s move to our city is exciting. They should help activate a part of Buford Highway that has long been under-utilized, and I am hopeful that the people who go to church there will spend money at many other Doraville businesses. I also think that the church seems to be committed to having programs at their location that will service some currently under-served members of our community. These are exciting times to be in Doraville!
In the city council’s last work session, we received a few presentations about projects that the city has rolled out, or is rolling out soon. I am sharing them here for any residents who are interested:
Text to 911 – this is a new feature that allows you to use your mobile phone to text “911” if you are in a situation where you cannot make a voice call. This feature is active now, and is text-only (does not support pictures/video). If you use this feature outside Doraville, in a jurisdiction that does not offer text-to-911, you will receive an error message. Police will not be able to track you via text, so you will need to tell them your location.
Adopt-A-Spot – this is a program that the city is rolling out in May. It will offer residents an official way to beautify city owned property and get support. For example, someone planting tulips in the right-of-way would be able to get the city to purchase bulbs, or provide soil or mulch. Contact city hall at 770-451-8745 to get more information
This week, I also received a copy of Dekalb County’s most recent update on the sewer consent decree. This decree has been stalled for a number of years, but the county says it is back on track. They list factors that have stood in the way of carrying out this decree in the past, and what they’ve done to address them. They also ask that residents help the county’s efforts by not pouring Fats, Oils or Greases down their drain. Contact information for the department of Watershed Management is: 770-270-6243 or Dekalbwaterops@dekalbcountyga.gov
I recently received an email from a Doraville resident who had a number of concerns related to transparency and accountability in city government. I had not planned on publicly posting my response to that resident, but because I believe that a modified version of the note may have been forwarded to some folks, I want to make sure everyone has the opportunity to read the entire thing if they are interested.
My response gives you an idea of what -in my judgment – are the most important things the city needs to be focusing on. I am always open to feedback. You can email me at firstname.lastname@example.org or call me at 678-373-9137.
Here’s the unedited note:
I appreciate the email.
First off, since most of these questions were originally written for the candidate forum, I encourage you to view the video from the event (the one Tim put online is here: https://youtu.be/iXG-i_N2b0k). I already answered some of the questions you sent at that time – none of my answers have changed.
I ran on being someone who could work with any of the other council members – I said that consistently during the campaign. I’m still working on building bridges with everyone on the council. As one of 7 people on the dais, I can’t “demand” or “require” that my peers do anything. In fact, that’s the fastest way to not get my agenda accomplished.
If Georgia and Federal law allows a member of council to vote on an issue, then I definitely can’t demand that they not vote. From my discussions with the city attorney and the attorneys at Georgia Municipal Association, a campaign contribution does not constitute a conflict of interest.
On irresponsible landlords – I have been working many angles to try to focus on this problem. We’re limited in what we can do by state law – the state prohibits us from creating a rental registry or requiring business licenses for people who rent homes out. The city is working with the county to conduct an audit of homestead exemption to ensure that no one is improperly claiming an exemption. If we find anyone who is, we can target them for further examination. I think now that we have a fully staffed code enforcement team, we also should see some better results on that end as well.
Regarding the city manager – this is the most critical position in the city. We did not have anyone permanently in this role when I was elected, and it was obvious that the city was suffering because of it. We quickly hired Regina Gates, whose experience as city manager of San Jose, California and Norfolk, Virginia we are lucky to benefit from. The council set a regular review process to evaluate her performance at the time we negotiated her contract. I also have bi-weekly meetings with her where I get updated on what is staff is working on and am able to ask questions and make suggestions about our operations.
On transparency, I agree with you. A lot of the ideas you have listed are good ones. I want to see a lot more transparency from the city on a number of issues. I want to have more commissions/committees made up of members of the public. I want to see our website and electronic communications get better. That said, I think we need to focus on first things first: the city was handed to this council without a city manager, without a city clerk, without a parks director, public works director or a finance director. We also did not have a contract for code enforcement. These positions are critical for the operation of the city’s basic functions – let alone improving processes or helping enable citizen committees. In the first three months I’ve been on council, we have hired a city manager and agreed to a contract for code enforcement. We’re close on a city clerk. All the other positions are still open. I think we probably need to create some new positions that are specifically in charge of marketing and our website, but there will be some challenges in finding the money to pay for them in our budget. This is going to be a longer process than if the city had been running on all cylinders when I was elected. In this competitive job market, we do not have the luxury of demanding that key staff live in Doraville – particularly if we want to get the best people possible.
You and I may not agree on what issues are most important to focus on first, or what the best tactics for moving the city forward are – but I think we do agree that we want to see Doraville be a better run city that is more accessible to its residents. The voters elected me to use my judgement on the best ways to move us in that direction, and I assure you that I am working hard to do that.
In 2015, Doraville published its Parks and Recreation Master Plan, laying out a framework of improvements needed for every park in the city. Here are the improvements that were called for in the Northwoods neighborhood’s parks:
Unfortunately, the city never developed a strategy for implementing the plan, and thus improvements for the Northwoods parks have remained in limbo since 2015. This is despite the fact that, at the time the plan was published, Brook Park was the 4th most used asset within our city’s Parks system (behind the Civic Center, Forest Fleming Fields, and Forest Fleming Arena). It was also listed as one of the most underdeveloped parks in the system.
On Saturday, the city’s staff emailed Doraville council members with a finalized capital budget for the rest of this fiscal year (through June 30, 2018). A lot of the items in this budget are repairs or maintenance that must be done for safety or legal compliance. There are also a few items listed that we have received ear-marked grants for, so we’re limited in how we can spend that money.
I was happy to see that there was some money devoted to a park in Northwoods, but it was $30,000 for a walking path in Autumn park (the line item also mentions stream improvements, but these will cost a lot more than $30,000 and are unlikely to happen this year). The city also is proposing to spend $10,000 on playground equipment in Autumn Park and English Oak Park – even though the playground equipment in both these parks is fairly new.
The city council has to vote on this budget on Monday night. I think that residents in Northwoods might prefer to see some improvements in Brook Park rather than in Autumn Park. I’m open to making an amendment to this capital budget to reallocate the money if it looks like there is lot of support in that direction.
Here are some of my ideas:
Some of the other recommendations in the 2015 Parks Plan (fixing the tennis courts and removing ivy from the stream in Autumn park, in particular) are good – we just aren’t going to realistically accomplish them for $30-40,000.
I’m interested in hearing thoughts from Northwoods residents about what kind of improvements they’d like to see with the parks. Please feel free to email me at email@example.com. I know that my fellow District 2 Council Member, MD Naser, would also like to hear from you.
This week, I had a conversation with our city manager about several of the complaints regarding trash collection that people have posted to social media or sent to me directly. Among the biggest issues:
The city manager will be meeting with Advanced Disposal’s representative in the next few days to address some of the service issues we’ve experienced – including skipped pick-ups and carelessness with bins. At the same time, the city is going to work to improve its own processes related to garbage pick-up, scheduling and issue-tracking. In the coming weeks, I expect we will see some communication directly from the city about this plan and what it will mean for us.
In the meantime, the city should always be your point of contact for sanitation-related issues, and I’ve been given renewed assurance that our administrative staff will be following up on any requests they receive regarding complaints. The number for city hall is 770-451-8745.
If you would like to have an appliance, sofa, or other bulk-item picked up, please call city hall at 770-451-8745 to request the pick-up. They will give you a date when they are able to schedule Advanced Disposal to come pick it up. Do not place your items on the curb before this date. If the pick-up doesn’t happen, please let the city know immediately so they can address that with the vendor.
Please feel free to reach out directly to me at firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any trash-collection related issue that does not get addressed in a timely manner or a question that city hall has not been able to answer for you.
I’ve received emails from some people who complain that there is no quality development at the site of the former GM Plant – now known as “Assembly” or “Assembly Yards.” While things have moved more slowly at Assembly than I would have liked, it’s not fair to say that there is no quality development happening.
In fact, the world headquarters of Serta Simmons Bedding (also known as “SSB,” the largest mattress manufacturer in the world!) is currently under construction at Assembly, and slated to open in 2019. I ride MARTA to work, and can see this development happening on a day-to-day basis from the platform of the Doraville station. It’s been very exciting. There are already 2 stories built, with more to come – the final facility will be 210,000 square feet and will house 500 employees on a 5-acre campus. This is a big company that believes in the city’s vision for that site – having them on board makes it more likely that other companies will decide to move here.
I was recently at a BisNow forum where Andy Barfield, a Vice President at Holder Properties (which is developing the SSB campus) spoke about the site selection process. They wanted to consolidate along the I-85 corridor, and liked Assembly because of its vision, its proximity to MARTA — and because it was one of the only sites in the area with that much contiguous space:
Barfield did refer to some challenges to an evolving master plan like the one at Assembly. Since the site is still under construction and there aren’t other large tenants, you are sometimes figuring out where roads and utilities are as you go:
Real Estate development projects are extremely expensive, and take a long time to get off the ground. Assembly is going to be “under construction” for some time. With that said, I think that Serta Simmons Bedding deciding to settle in Doraville is extremely good news, and a sign of momentum picking up for the project.